Grade
separation would draw two interior lanes along Genesee Avenue,
one northbound and one southbound, below Governor Drive in a short
(115' long) underpass. This would permit continuous
flow along Genesee at this critical intersection.
Such a focussed improvement, which does more to increase the performance
of the existing road system as opposed to increasing its capacity,
is extremely well-suited to the particular type of congestion
experienced on Genesee Avenue.
Peak
hour traffic on Genesee Avenue is commuter traffic. The flow is
essentially one-way:
northbound in the morning and southbound in the afternoon. This
commuter traffic is largely associated with the business and commercial
sites along Genesee Avenue in North University City: UTC, Costa
Verde, Eastgate, Renaissance, etc.
Between
Nobel Drive and SR-52, Genesee Avenue has a low density of signalized
intersections and curb cuts. Congestion nucleates at the Governor
Drive intersection. There, commuter traffic backs up when Genesee
through traffic gets a red light. The cycle time for the signal
is an excruciatingly long three minutes. Impressive
queues form behind the intersection, particularly
southbound during PM peak, when then can extend half a mile to
Centurion Square (UCHS), or, on Fridays, an entire mile up to
Nobel Drive.
Traffic
counts show that 80% of northbound traffic on Genesee proceeds
straight through the Governor Drive intersection during AM
peak, and 70% during PM
peak. An underpass, with one lane in each direction,
would permit continuous N/S flow at this critical intersection,
completely relieving this critical bottleneck. No other structural
alternative can accomplish this result.
Grade
separation would result in a dramatic improvement at this critical
intersection. The cycle time could be brought down from three
minutes to close to one minute, and the intersection level of
service improved from F to C (at build-out). Pedestrians, rather
than crossing seven lanes of traffic, or even nine (with Genesee
Avenue widening), would cross only
four lanes. Their safety and convenience would be
improved by the placement of broad 54' wide safe islands over
the underpass. These islands would also afford an opportunity
for creative landscaping. Finally, by taking thousands of through
moves out of the intersection each peak hour, the signal could
be re-phased and green time reallocated, giving more green to
other turning movements and to pedestrians, and dramatically reducing
delays.
The
intersection is extremely well-suited
for a grade separation, since it lies at the top of a hill. Unlike
the Genesee Avenue widening, it would not require elimination
of the entire median strip, much of which is nicely landscaped
with mature trees. Most of Genesee Avenue would remain unchanged,
as a four lane major street, within the grade separation scenario.
The
knee-jerk response to congestion is to build more roads. Traffic
engineers and planners increasingly recognize that new roads rapidly
fill with new traffic,
often resulting in comparable or even worse congestion than the
status quo ante. In other words, "managing congestion
by adding capacity is like managing your weight by loosening your
belt."
The
main problem with the grade separation is that the Draft EIR traffic
study projects volumes on Genesee to continue to increase, to
the point where other intersections at Decoro Street and University
City High School would fail. However, we question whether the
projected increases, forecast for the year 2030, are reliable.
The City's own traffic counts show that the average daily traffic
on Genesee Avenue has not changed
since 1987.
(Click here
to see real-world examples of grade separation.)